put aside - for a moment - the verve Asor controversy. From the perspective of academic politics, the reasoning of the professor is flawless (on the other hand, we would have surprised to the contrary). On the one hand, there are candidates who represent the continuity under the previous management (Avallone, Edward Arnold, and especially the friars) and then there are others: Campanella, Martinelli, Orlandi, Vestron and Zuliani. The cold logic says that whoever gets the most electoral votes wins. To beat the Friars should oppose a plank of his equally formidable: Science and Engineering. Translated into "numbers": the votes of the President of AST (Guido Martinelli) and those of the Dean of Engineering (Fabrizio Vestron). Around this axis can be constructed and consent of the other faculties of the other candidates excluded from the pact .
What does not work in this reasoning? The impression that this vote expresses a joint political richer and more than Academic intuit the shrewd and complaints. The assessment of the previous management
Guarini is not so clear. Positive and negative reviews are evenly distributed both among those who belonged to both of who he was - even brutally - excluded. Listen and read the candidates' answers on this subject (believe teachers are not use to practice courtesy institutional when it comes to judging their colleagues).
instances of the various candidates and the abstention of many active faculty show that electoral promises and exchanges are much more fluid and to be defined. Then maybe the polls
brutalize / simplify all the options - but for now this is so, and - For Wisdom - a good thing.
Update:
read the Manifesto that tests for the medical professions was cited an article by prof. Asor. Of course this article replication Friars, have nothing to do with the interview with Republic yesterday. I think.
0 comments:
Post a Comment